Top 150 2010 PR Consultancies
PRWeek

PR has weathered the storm well

Despite dire predictions, the PR industry has emerged from a tough year in relatively good shape

I

f ‘ flat’ really is ‘ the new growth’ then 2009’s income figures are good news for the PR industry, because flat is the overall message this year.

With the estimates that we use for Sarbanes-Oxley-affected agencies, the total amount billed by the Top 150 UK consultancies dipped slightly from £858m in 2009, to £814m in 2009. However when we asked management consultants Kingston Smith W1 to calculate average growth of those that enter the table, the picture was one of slight growth (0.75 per cent).

But looking at the group table opposite, which shows the market capitalisation of marcoms groups with PR interests, it is hard not to feel optimistic.

With the exception of Band & Brown owner Cossette, which is no longer listed, all marcoms groups have increased their market capitalisation. Chime Communications, which is heavily reliant on PR revenues, has seen exceptional uplift in its share price.

All the signs point to 2010 being a blessed relief. Many agencies report winning more clients in the first quarter of 2010 than in the whole of 2009. Next year’s tables will make interesting reading, but there is every reason to believe the PR industry will once again show the strong growth it posted pre-2009.

As in previous years, some agencies declined to enter figures for this year’s league tables, citing the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

We have estimated fee income for these agencies using a formula agreed with the PRCA and Kingston Smith W1.

For top City agencies, we estimated perhead productivity at £280,000 and for City and corporate combinations, we used a figure of £190,000. For generalist agencies we estimated £97,000 per head. We multiplied these by the estimated number of staff at each agency to calculate a fee income for 2009. Brunswick declines to enter the tables, so we estimated its figures in the same way.

In previous years, we asked agencies to supply their total staff numbers. This year we asked for the number of fee-earning PR staff only in order to more accurately reflect per-head productivity.

For many agencies 2009 was a good year, with generic growth despite the economic circumstances

Francis Ingham Director general, PRCA

Francis Ingham

Last year, the PRCA predicted that 2009 would be ‘a tough year for many’. Well, that was definitely the case, but it was certainly not the ‘PR Armageddon’ that others forecast.

The dire warnings of across-theboard falls in revenue and profitability turned out to be mere phantoms, and for many agencies 2009 was a good year, with generic growth despite the economic circumstances. Whatever else can be said about 2009, it’s clear that nobody simply coasted on an expanding economy.

This growth is all the more remarkable in view of the contractions visible virtually everywhere else. These achievements reflect fantastically well on agency MDs and show the inherent value and strength of the PR business. Far too many agencies, though, 2009 did see a falling back, when survival in decent shape became the goal. That so few agencies went to the wall or suffered irrecoverable damage is again a

source of relief and, for many, a cause for celebration.

At the top end, there is no point in denying that ours remains a heavily London-centric industry. Granted, most of the very big agencies do have offices outside of London, but you have to reach number 30 before you find an agency headquartered outside the metropolis.

Having said that, those Top 150 agencies that are outside Londonhave tended to weather the storm better than the norm would suggest. In particular, there is clearly a vibrant PR hub growing in the North West.

So where now for the industry? All the available evidence tells me that we have turned a corner. Recovery will not be evenly spread, and some sectors and locations are certainly performing better than others. But the recovery is definitely here. 2010 certainly will not be an easy year – nobody is predicting ‘Paradise Regained’, but at least nobody’s predicting PR Armageddon either.

Esther Carder Partner, Kingston Smith W1

Esther Carder

In last year’s Top 150 survey, the PR industry showed income growth of ten per cent. However, as I predicted then, there was no doubledigit growth this year and the industry has managed less than one per cent growth.

Is this really as bad as it sounds? Compared with the rest of the marketing services industry, this can actually be considered a good result – because flat really does seem to be the new growth. For example, WPP’s like-for-like revenues fell by eight per cent in 2009, with PR and public affairs performing just a little less worse than other disciplines such as advertising and media.

Encouragingly, across the sample roughly twice as many consultancies showed growth as those that showed a decrease. However, aside from the obvious pitfalls of having specialised in technology or financial PR, it really was a bit of a mixed bag of results.

To a large extent, PR consultancies’ fortunes were dictated by the luck of the draw of which clients they acted for. Those that were heavily exposed to the ‘wrong’ account will have suffered more than others. It will have reinforced the message that you should try not to be over-reliant on one particular client. We recommend no more than 20 per cent of your income should come from one account.

Again, as I predicted last year, in the wave of reduced marketing spend PR has fared a little better than most other disciplines. There continues to be positive comment about the increasing importance of PR in the world of digital and social media, and this has helped in its comparative resilience to the recession.

2010 is unlikely to see any marked upturn in marketing spend, but owing to the early raft of cost-cutting across the industry in 2009, I think marketing services and PR margins should prove to be much better in 2010 than in 2009.


DAWN OF THE GOLDEN AGE? Huntsworth chief executive, Lord Chadlington

Lord Chadlington

Huntsworth holds the largest and most mgeographically diverse UK portfolio of PR consultancies. What happens to Huntsworth, therefore, broadly reflects what is happening in UK public relations. Increasingly, we are the bellwether of the state of the industry.

From mid-2008, we saw some 15 per cent decline in financial and corporate PR. During this recession, stock markets slumped, IPOs were cancelled, mergers were aborted and clients became much more nervous about their future. Some of our financial PR companies have successfully broadened their services, building a strong retainer base that provided a buffer against the worst ravages of recession.

A period of significant political change in the UK and continental Europe heralded a growth in public affairs. However, during the latter half of 2009 the abuses of public affairs activity cast a dark shadow over this sector, which is perceived as needing radical reform.

In a recession, clients often cut advertising budgets and – to compensate – consumer PR booms. We saw double-digit, organic growth in many of our consumer brands and sectors. The crossover between consumer PR and medical education drove healthcare PR forward and leads us to expect strong growth in these sectors over the next five years. And every major PR business has benefited from increased government spending on information and education programmes.

But PR growth is now underpinned by digital comms, which is an integral part of all we do. Where we can isolate reliable growth numbers, as in Tonic Life, digital grew by more than 100 per cent last year. So, what are the prospects for 2010? We expect a vigorous bounce-back in financial and corporate PR; continuing growth in consumer activities; a steadying of the ship in public affairs, but working under intense public scrutiny; ever faster growth in healthcare, but some decline in PR for government and public bodies. The real growth driver, however, will be the creative use of digital media. Clients should increasingly turn to us as a natural source of digital counsel – as the guardians of content in all forms of media. And if we can meet that challenge, professionally and profitably, then PR is on the verge of a new golden age.

75% Increase in Publicis' market capitalisation since 2009

Rank
Company
Market capitalisation (£m)
10
09
 
10
09
%change
1
1
Omnicom (US) Pleon, Fleishman-Hillard, Gavin Anderson, GPlus Europe,
8,113
5,035
62
2
2
WPP (UK) AxiCom, Blanc & Otus, Buchanan, Burson-Marsteller, Dewey Square, Cohn &
Wolfe, Chime Communications (part owned), Clarion Communications, Hill & Knowlton,
Finsbury, Ogilvy Government Relations, Ogilvy Health, Ogilvy PR, Public Strategies
8,102
4,876
66
3
3
Publicis (France) MS&L, Freud Communications, Publicis Consultants
5,526
3,159
75
4
4
Interpublic (US) GolinHarris, Rogers & Cowan, Weber Shandwick
2,780
1,401
98
5
5
Havas (France) Cake Group, Maitland, Euro RSCG Biss Lancaster,
Euro RSCG Apex Communications
1,256
759
65
6
6
Huntsworth (UK) Citigate Dewe Rogerson, Grayling UK, Haslimann Taylor,
The Red Consultancy, Tonic Life, Stephanie Churchill PR
170
106
61
7
9
Chime (UK) Good Relations, Bell Pottinger, Resonate, Harvard, DeFacto Communications
129
41
213
8
7
Photon (Australia) Frank, Hotwire, Skywrite Communications
118
48
145
9
10
Creston (UK) Nelson Bostock, Red Door Communications
53
17
214
10
11
Next Fifteen (UK) Bite Communications, Text 100, Lexis PR, Inferno
34
15
124
NA
8
Cossette (Canada) Band & Brown, Brando
delisted
44
-100

Notes

Individual companies listed are PR agencies; other marketing outfits are omitted

Market capitalisation figures provided by Kingston Smith W1, as of 19 March 2010. Foreign currencies were converted to sterling using exchange rates on that date

UK-listed PR-dominated groups

Website designed by mcmnet.co.uk